Thursday, March 13, 2014

Though the Christians are portrayed as those who want to help the Sudanese, their approach is often involuntarily counterproductive. While Achak is tied up, he tries to kick his legs against the floor so that the noise can alert his Christian neighbors that he is being robbed and needs help. He thinks that since Christian institutions are usually the ones that aide the relocated Sudanese people, they will be most likely to help him. Achak acknowledges that the Christians have good intentions, but since their lives are so different from those they are trying to help they can come off the same way. "...he had read something about the persistence of slavery in Sudan; his church was sending money to an evangelical group that was planning to travel to Sudan to buy back slaves 139)." Not only is this ironic in the sense that he is buying back slaves and therefore not really changing the industry at all, but evangelical Islamists and Arabs are the one that are destroying Sudan. Religion is a huge part of the conflict, so adding another religious group to it seems counter intuitive. They are just giving money to the slavers that capture the people, and therefore fueling the business. This is an important ironic point in the book because it exhibits how lack of experience and tunnel vision makes us look at things, even if we don't mean to. We don't really understand until we've been in their shoes.

1 comment:

  1. The Christians that help the Sudanese may not have been putting their money in the right place. With the dilemma on the topic of buying back slaves, resources from Christians in the U.S. and other countries around the world could have been going to the civilians in the refugee camps as their conditions were also poor. If religion was not such a relevant topic in the aiding of the Sudanese and the whole crisis, much more could have been done to help the displaced people. When charities are created, are they mostly for the good of that particular religion or are the money and resources going to the right place. The one step forward, two steps back nature of buying back slaves shows that this is a never ending cycle and will only fuel the business. Just with other products if the demand is high, people will do whatever they can to sell it quickly but if their is no demand for their product they will change their tactics and possibly switch to a different product. Thanks Erin for bringing up and interesting topic.

    ReplyDelete